文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：环境侵权民事诉讼举证责任分配之比较研究

英文题名：A Comparative Study of Evidential Burden Distribution in Civil Actions of Environment Torts

作者：张睿[1]

第一作者：张睿

机构：[1]河南省政法管理干部学院民商法系

第一机构：河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院

年份：2009

卷号：27

期号：3

起止页码：36-39

中文期刊名：河北法学

外文期刊名：Hebei Law Science

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2008】；CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2008_2009】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：环境侵权民事诉讼;举证责任分配;比较研究

外文关键词：civil action of environment tort ; evidential burden distribution ; comparative study

摘要：在环境侵权民事诉讼中,举证责任分配的合理与否关系到环境法目的的实现和环境诉讼程序价值的发挥。但传统举证责任分配理论对环境诉讼而言具有不适应性。因此,两大法系对环境诉讼都发展了举证责任分配理论。通过比较考察发现,环境诉讼的举证责任分配应当按照公平正义原则,结合环境诉讼的特点,从举证难易程度、环境立法宗旨、平等保护和环境侵权纠纷的多样性等因素来综合衡量。相比之下,我国环境案件举证责任分配的基本规则还存在诸多缺陷,因此应规定较为开放的举证责任分配制度原则。
In the civil action of environment tort, to properly distribute evidential burden will affect the realization of the aim of environmental law and the exertion of the value of environment action procedure. However, the traditional theory of evidential burden distribution does not apply to environment action. Thus, the two genealogies of law developed that theory. By comparative studies, it is found that civil action as to the distribution of evidential burden should be balanced comprehensively in accordance with equitable and just principle, combining with the features of environment action, level of difficulty, legislative purpose, equality protection and diversity of environment tort disputes. Given the deficiencies existed in the basic principle of the evidential burden distribution in the cases in China, there should be an far more opener principle for relevant system.