文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：《满江红·怒发冲冠》词作者综论——兼与惠康祐同志商榷

英文题名：An Overview of the Academic Debate on the Authorship of The River All Red——Bristling with Anger ——Including an Discussion with Mr. Hui Kangyou

作者：陈世杰[1]

第一作者：陈世杰

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学文化传播学院

第一机构：河南财经政法大学文化传播学院

年份：2014

卷号：13

期号：4

起止页码：31-37

中文期刊名：南阳师范学院学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Nanyang Normal University

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：2013年河南省社科联;河南省经团联调研课题(SKL-2013-803)

语种：中文

中文关键词：《满江红》词;作者;王越;于谦;岳飞

外文关键词：The River All Red; author; Wang Yue; Yu Qian; Yue Fei

摘要：自从20世纪30年代著名学者余嘉锡在《四库提要辨证》一书的《岳武穆遗文》一篇中对《满江红》一词的作者提出质疑之后,疑者渐众,一般有三种怀疑:岳飞说,王越说和于谦说。此文通过考证史料,结合岳飞、王越、于谦的自身经历,认为此词的作者应为岳飞无疑。在论析过程中,进一步指出了其他观点的论证不周和失之严谨,以期与持"王越说"和"于谦说"者商榷。
In the 1930s,Yuewumu ancient writing（ 岳武穆遗文）,an article in Sikutiyaobianzheng（ 四库提要辨 证） written by a noted scholar named Yu Jiaxi,raised doubts about the authorship of The River All Red（ 满江红）. Since then,various suspicions and debates have sprung out which are mainly classifiable into three convincing groups,namely the ones favoring the authorship of Yue Fei,Wang Yue and Yu Qian respectively. According to some textual research and historical material and considering the respective living experiences of the three figures, the present author aims to support the original view,that is,The River All Red（ 满江红） was written by Yue Fei. This paper will point out the weaknesses of the other two groups＇ claims,with a view to generating deeper discussions with supporters of both the other two groups of views.