文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：高校学术不端行为的司法干预:现实与未来

英文题名：Judicial Intervention with Academic Misconduct in Universities:Reality and Future

作者：杨金华[1]

第一作者：杨金华

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学法学院,河南郑州450046

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院

年份：2021

卷号：23

期号：12

起止页码：87-94

中文期刊名：黄河科技学院学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Huanghe S&T University

基金：河南省教育科学规划重大招标课题(〔2020〕-JKGHZDZB-05)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：学术不端行为;司法干预;现实障碍;扩大趋势

外文关键词：academic misconduct;judicial intervention;realistic obstacle;expanding tendency

摘要：通过实证研究发现,司法干预学术不端行为的积极作用体现在保障权利与惩治违法的协同性以及司法裁判结果的权威性,但也存在现实障碍,表现为诉讼主体关系的有限性、审查对象的非彻底性、判案依据的模糊性、司法干预作用相对受限。随着法治建设的深入推进,未来司法干预的趋势是:诉讼主体关系将不断扩大;诉讼事由将更为多元;民事诉讼与行政诉讼将齐头并进。为增强司法干预的功能,国家层面立法要体系化,司法审判要从形式走向实质,刑事裁判功能应得以发挥,应统一司法审判标准,校内规制要发挥前置作用。
Through empirical research,it is found that the positive role of judicial intervention with academic misconduct is embodied in the synergy of protecting rights and punishing illegal activities,and the authority of judicial judgment results.However,there still exist practical obstacles:the limitation of litigation subject relationship;the non-thoroughness of the examination object;the fuzziness of the judgement basis;and the relatively limited function of judicial intervention.With the deepening legal construction,the tendency of future judicial intervention will be like the following:the relationship between litigants will expand continuously;the reasons of lawsuits will be more diverse;civil litigation and administrative litigation will advance side by side.In order to enhance the function of judicial intervention,the legislation at the national level should be systematized,the judicial trial should go from form to substance,the function of criminal judgment should be brought into full play,the judicial trial standards should be unified,and the school regulations should play its prepositive role.