文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：经典形式法治观的两难困境及克服——从富勒到菲尼斯

英文题名：The Dilemma and Solution of the Classical Formal Conception of the Rule of law——From Fuller to Finnis

作者：王志勇[1]

第一作者：王志勇

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学法学院

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院

年份：2021

卷号：15

期号：4

起止页码：138-147

中文期刊名：北方法学

外文期刊名：Northern Legal Science

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2021_2022】；

基金：2018年度国家法治与法学研究重点课题“先秦自然法思想研究”(18SFB1006);2018年度河南省哲学社会科学后期资助项目“法治社会的道德基础”(2018HQ019)的阶段性成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：经典形式法治;实质法治;道德属性;道德价值

外文关键词：The classical formal conception of the rule of law;substantive conception of the rule of law;moral attribute;moral value

摘要：经典形式法治观面临着如下两难困境:如果固守形式性要求,则其面临着"功效性难题"与"兼容性难题";如果增添实质性价值要求,则其可能就转化为实质法治观。形式法治观的典型代表富勒和菲尼斯都坚持形式法治,他们对"功效性难题"与"兼容性难题"分别发展出各自的解决方案。针对"功效性难题",究其根本,富勒的解决方案可以说奠基于义务论伦理学立场,而菲尼斯的解决方案则奠基于自然法伦理学立场。然而,两者都面临着深层次规范伦理学层面的论证难题。一个更合理的重构性辩护策略在于,虽然经典形式法治关注于形式,但其完全可以逻辑蕴涵的方式安置实质价值。针对"兼容性难题",富勒的"历史可能性"解释过于武断,而菲尼斯提出了更"薄"但更合理的"理由可能性"解释。对于中国法治建设的启示在于,形式版本的法治才是一种值得追求的理想,因为其蕴涵最低限度的人之尊严、自由等实质价值,由此可以搭建一种更具包容性的价值共识"平台"。尽管如此,我们仍需警惕,法治也仅是诸多美好价值的一种,其并非开启人类兴盛的万能钥匙。
The classical formal conception of the rule of law confront with the following dilemma:if it adheres to the formal requirements,it faces the questions of efficacy and compatibility;if the substantive value requirements are added,it may be converted into the substantive conception of the rule of law.As typical representatives of the formal conception of rule of law,both Fuller and Finnis maintained the formal conception of the rule of law,and they developed their own solutions for the questions of efficacy and compatibility respectively.Basically Fuller’s solution was based on deontology,while Finnis’solution was on natural law ethics.However,they both faced with the deeper level of normative ethics problems.A more reasonable reconstructive defense strategy is that although the classical formal conception rule of law focused on form,it could logically imply substantive moral values.In view of the"compatibility question",Fuller’s"historical possibility"interpretation was too arbitrary,while Finnis proposed a weaker but more reasonable"reasonable possibility"interpretation.Therefore,the enlightenment for the construction of the rule of law in China is that the formal version of the rule of law is an ideal that is worth pursuing,because it contains the minimum essential values of human dignity,freedom and other substantive values for building a more inclusive value consensus"platform".In spite of this,it is necessary to remain vigilant,for the rule of law is only one of many good values,and it is not a master key to the human flourishing.