登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

矛盾化解型诉讼的形成与科学诉讼机制的建构    

The Formation of Conflict-resolving Litigation and the Construction of Scientific Litigation Mechanism

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:矛盾化解型诉讼的形成与科学诉讼机制的建构

英文题名:The Formation of Conflict-resolving Litigation and the Construction of Scientific Litigation Mechanism

作者:刘用军[1]

第一作者:刘用军

机构:[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046

第一机构:河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

年份:2021

卷号:36

期号:4

起止页码:69-87

中文期刊名:河南财经政法大学学报

外文期刊名:Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

收录:国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2021_2022】;

语种:中文

中文关键词:裁判型诉讼;矛盾化解型诉讼;诉讼权利;审判中心;科学诉讼机制

外文关键词:judgment litigation;conflict resolution litigation;litigation rights;trial center;scientific litigation mechanism

摘要:改革开放至今40余年的法治发展中,我国诉讼模式也出现了政策型诉讼、裁判型诉讼和矛盾化解型诉讼三种类型,当前我们已在着力构建并实践着矛盾化解型诉讼。矛盾化解型诉讼诞生的总体背景是社会转型带来的矛盾激增和案件量上升,危及到社会稳定的任务和和谐社会的目标。矛盾化解型诉讼的特点是重司法的大局观和推行司法能动主义,实现联动办案,追求结案彻底,简化诉讼程序,提升司法效率。但矛盾化解型诉讼客观上也带来一些问题,即未能有效减轻司法压力,弱化了诉讼权利保障和程序正义价值,混淆了司法程序与政府社会治理的功能差异,也一定程度上影响到审判中心诉讼制度的实现。当前,矛盾化解型诉讼的基本格局和趋势仍然难以撼动,但也应当对此有所补救,即适当增加司法人员的数量,激活非诉讼程序,有节制适用简易诉讼程序,维持诉讼程序的中道性,调整认罪认罚从宽制度中检察机关的主导性,保障审判中心诉讼制度的实现。
In the forty years of the development of the rule of law since the reform and opening up,there have been three types of litigation modes in China:policy litigation,judgment litigation and conflict resolution litigation.At present,we have been focusing on the construction and practice of conflict resolution litigation.The general background of the emergence of conflict-resolving litigation is the upsurge of conflicts and increasing number of cases brought by social transformation,which endangers the task of social stability and the goal of harmonious society.The characteristics of the conflict-resolving litigation are to focus on the overarching view of the judiciary and the promotion of judicial activism,realize joint handling of cases,pursuit a thorough settlement of cases,simplify the proceedings,and improve judicial efficiency.However,the conflict-resolving litigation objectively also brings some problems,that is,it fails to effectively reduce the judicial pressure,weakens the protection of litigation rights and the value of procedural justice,confuses the functional difference between judicial procedure and government social governance,and also affects the realization of the trial center litigation system to some extent.At present,the contradiction resolving litigation basic pattern and trend is still difficult to shake,but we should also make some remedies,that is,appropriately increase the number of judicial personnel,activate non litigation procedures,moderate the application of summary litigation procedures,maintain the middle nature of the procedure,adjust the dominance of the procuratorial authority in the lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment,and ensure the realization of the judicial center litigation system.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©河南财经政法大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心