登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

事必躬亲还是权力共享?——内隐追随理论视角下领导者授权行为研究    

To Empower or Not to Empower Your Followers:An Implicit Followership Theory Perspective on Leadership Empowerment Behavior

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:事必躬亲还是权力共享?——内隐追随理论视角下领导者授权行为研究

英文题名:To Empower or Not to Empower Your Followers:An Implicit Followership Theory Perspective on Leadership Empowerment Behavior

作者:彭坚[1];冉雅璇[1];康勇军[2];韩雪亮[3]

第一作者:彭坚

机构:[1]暨南大学管理学院;[2]广东财经大学创业教育学院;[3]河南财经政法大学工商管理学院

第一机构:暨南大学管理学院,广州501632

年份:2016

卷号:39

期号:5

起止页码:1197-1203

中文期刊名:心理科学

外文期刊名:Journal of Psychological Science

收录:CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】;社科基金资助期刊;CSCD:【CSCD2015_2016】;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】;

语种:中文

中文关键词:内隐追随理论;积极追随原型;积极追随特质;领导者授权行为;多项式回归

外文关键词:positive followership prototype, implicit followership theory, positive followership characteristic, leadership empowerment behavior, polynomial regression

摘要:本文基于内隐追随理论,探讨了领导者的积极追随原型与追随者的积极追随特质的匹配情形如何形塑领导者的授权行为。基于广东省2家食品企业的226份上下级配对数据,采用多项式回归和响应面分析技术发现:当追随者的积极追随特质与领导者的积极追随原型相匹配时,追随者能够成为领导者的"意中人"。面对"意中人",领导者将展现更多的授权行为。在匹配情况下,高—高匹配时的领导者授权行为高于低—低匹配的情形。
As empowerment is found to enhance followers' work motivation, and to allow them to be more adaptive to the rapid changing environment, the role of leadership in empowering followers has received increasing attention in organizational research and practice. Leadership empowerment behavior refers to a set of actions in which a leader shares power with his or her followers through highlighting the meaningfulness of work, fostering participation in decision making, conveying confidence in high performance, and providing autonomy from bureaucratic constraints. While previous research on this topic extols the positive effects resulted from leadership empowerment behavior, it remains unclear what factors can predict the emergence of leadership empowerment behavior. In recent years, the implicit followership theory, which comes from the combination of social cognitive theory and followership literature, draws a new perspective to investigate the antecedents of leadership empowerment behavior. According to the implicit followership theory, individuals generate personal assumptions about the traits that characterize followers. The integral elements of the implicit followership theory are prototypes, which are abstract and composite mental representations for particular cognitive categories. Based on the valence of a prototype, followership prototypes are classified into two types: the positive followership prototype (PFP) and the negative followership prototype. PFP comprises the assumed traits characterizing good followers, such as industriousness, enthusiasm and good citizenship. To date, many scholars focused on leaders' PFP and found that leaders' PFP affected followers' job attitude and performance through the leader-member exchange. In compliance with the research approach for positive psychology, we also plan to concentrate on leaders' PFP. In organizational settings, leaders' PFP may be activated unconsciously and compared with the followers' explicit/actual followership characteristics in the leader-follower interaction. Leaders act in accordance with the outcome of these comparisons. Drawing on such arguements, we aim to explore the effect of the congruence between leader's PFP and follower's positive followership trait (PFT) on leadership empowerment behavior. Polynomial regression combined with the response surface methodology was used to test the hypotheses. Based on a sample of 226 leader- follower dyads from two companies in China, it showed that: (1) The more agreement (i.e., higher congruence) between a leader's PFP and follower's PFT, the higher the leadership empowerment behavior; (2) In the cases of congruence, leadership empowerment behavior was higher when leader PFP and follower PFT were both high instead of being both low. There are still some shortcomings in this paper. First, the study probes only into the direct impact of followership prototype congruence on leadership empowerment behavior, whereas the underlying mechanism and its boundary conditions are not discussed. We suggest the mediating role of trust in followers and moderating role of leadership prototype agreement can be examined in future studies. In addition, we explain the relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable in detail, adopting the method of multi-source data to avoid common method variance, but the cross-sectional study design constrains our findings about causality. Thus, future research can take advantage of a longitudinal study design or experimental design to test the effect of implicit-explicit followership congruence on leadership empowerment behavior.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©河南财经政法大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心