登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

论非法电子证据排除规则的完善路径    

On perfecting path of exclusionary rule of illegal electronic evidence

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:论非法电子证据排除规则的完善路径

英文题名:On perfecting path of exclusionary rule of illegal electronic evidence

作者:侯东亮[1];游忆[1]

第一作者:侯东亮

机构:[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450016

第一机构:河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院|河南财经政法大学法学院

年份:2023

卷号:16

期号:5

起止页码:475-480

中文期刊名:沈阳工业大学学报:社会科学版

外文期刊名:Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

收录:国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金:河南省哲学社会科学规划基金项目(2018BFX0002)。

语种:中文

中文关键词:证据法学;电子证据;非法证据;排除规则;排除标准

外文关键词:evidence law;electronic evidence;illegal evidence;exclusionary rule;exclusionary standard

摘要:非法证据排除规则是刑事诉讼中至关重要的证据规则之一,在司法中的适用直接关系到诉讼程序及诉讼结果的公正性。电子证据作为法定证据类型,应当属于非法证据排除规则的适用范围。然而,目前我国非法电子证据排除存在缺少明确法律规定、缺少非法电子证据认定及排除标准、电子证据合法性审查效果欠佳等问题。为解决以上问题,进一步完善非法电子证据排除规则,需要以立法形式将电子证据纳入非法证据排除规则适用范围,针对不同类型的电子证据设置不同的排除标准,并发布指导性案例以引导刑事司法实践。
The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence is one of the most important evidence rules in criminal procedure.Its application in judicature is directly related to the fairness of litigation procedure and litigation result.As a type of legal evidence,electronic evidence should belong to the application scope of exclusionary rule of illegal evidence.However,at present,there are some problems in the exclusion of illegal electronic evidence in China,such as the lack of clear legal provisions,the deficiency of recognition and exclusion standards,and the poor effectiveness of the legitimacy review of electronic evidence,etc.In order to solve the above problems and further improve the exclusionary rules of illegal electronic evidence,it is necessary to include electronic evidence into the application scope of exclusionary rules of illegal evidence by the form of legislation,set different exclusionary standards for different types of electronic evidence,and issue relevant guiding cases to guide criminal justice practice.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©河南财经政法大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心