文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：刑事诉讼中事实与法律区分的传统逻辑与解释路径

英文题名：The Traditional Logic of and Explanatory Approach to the Law-Fact Distinction in Criminal Procedure

作者：巩寒冰[1]

第一作者：巩寒冰

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

年份：2020

卷号：42

期号：4

起止页码：61-80

中文期刊名：环球法律评论

外文期刊名：Global Law Review

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】；

基金：作者主持的2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“刑事案件事实认定的推论基础与解释性结构研究”(19CFX036)的研究成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：司法理性化;功能立场;审级制;证据推理;事实与法律

摘要：“事实与法律区分”服务于实用主义的功能需求。该区分的传统逻辑在世界范围内呈现着某种相似性。一方面是理论分类研究中的困境与争议,甚至“事实”与“法律”概念本身仍难以明确界分;另一方面是实践制度中的深度绑定,陪审制、审级制的发展与变革语境几乎混合了事实与法律相区分的研究。在我国,事实与法律区分同审级权限以及审判主体权限的划分存在密切关联,这种关联伴随着《人民陪审员法》的颁布引发了新的关注,但其蕴含的合理性问题及实际内涵并未获得明确表述。事实与法律在认识论领域的相似性,掩盖了它们在证据推理和狭义法律推理的推理形式之间,以及价值取向和形成机制方面的结构性差异。这些差异是司法理性化的深刻体现与内在动因,其实质是事实及其蕴含的真相价值对现代法律体系的根基性意义。是分配主义的功能性产物,旨在修补事实认定与法律适用间的“割裂”。
The distinction between fact and law serves the functional need of pragmatism and its traditional logic shows certain similarity throughout the world.On the one hand,there are dilemmas and controversies in theoretical classification research,and even difficulties in clearly distinguishing between the concepts of“fact”and“law”themselves;on the other hand,the two concepts are tightly bound to each other in practice and institutions,and the development of jury system and trial level system in the context of judicial reform has almost been mixed with the research on the distinction between fact and law.In China,the distinction between fact and law is closely related to the division of the function of different trial levels and the competences of different trial subjects.This relationship has attracted new attentions with the promulgation of the Law on People’s Assessors,although its rationality and actual connotation have not been clearly expressed.The similarity between fact and law in epistemology conceals some of their structural differences manifested in the reasoning form of evidence reasoning and narrow sense legal reasoning,as well as in value orientation and formation mechanism.These differences are the profound embodiment and internal motivation of judicial rationalization,the essence of which is the fundamental significance of fact and the truth value contained in fact to the modern legal system.They are the functional products of distributive theory,and aimed at repairing the“rapture”between the identification of fact and application of law.