文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：社会保障权司法救济机制研究

英文题名：A Research into the Judicial Remedy Mechanism of the Right to Social Security

作者：付龙飞[1,2]

第一作者：付龙飞

机构：[1]中南大学法学院;[2]河南财经政法大学法学院

第一机构：中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

年份：2011

期号：3

起止页码：156-160

中文期刊名：经济经纬

外文期刊名：Economic Survey

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2008】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2010_2011】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：社会保障权;救济机制;民事程序;行政程序

外文关键词：the right to social security; remedy mechanism; civil procedure; administrative procedure

摘要：社会保障权是现代社会公民的基本人权,其蕴涵着人的生存和人的尊严的基本需要。社会保障权易受到私权利和公权力侵害,社会保障权司法救济机制的选择和构建依赖于社会保障权的法律内涵和特征。作为现代公民的社会权和宪法权利,社会保障权具有法律强制性、主体多元性、关系复合性、公益性和可诉性的特点。我国社会保障权司法救济主要是通过"双轨制"来实现的,即民事程序和行政程序。但这两种模式与相关保障制度的缺失和不足影响到社会保障权利的救济,有必要在现有的法律框架内通过改造行政复议程序和仲裁程序、建立专门的社会保障法庭、确立公益诉讼制度和完善相关的司法救助与法律责任制度来构建我国社会保障权的救济机制,充分保障公民社会保障权的实现。
The right to social security is the basic human right of modern citizens,which contains basic needs of a person＇s survival and human dignity.The right to social security is vulnerable to the infringement of privacy right and public power and the choice and construction of its judicial remedy mechanism depend on the legal contents and characteristics of the right to social security.As the social right and constitutional right of modern citizens,the right to social security has the properties of legal compulsion,pluralistic subjects,compound relationships,public welfare and actionability.The judicial implementation relies on ＂dual system＂,namely,civil procedure and administrative procedure.But the deficiency of the two models and relevant security systems affects the remedy of social security right.It is necessary to construct our country＇s social security right remedy mechanism in the existing legal framework and fully safeguard citizens＇ social security rights by transforming the administrative review procedure and arbitration procedure,establishing a dedicated social security court,establishing public interest litigation system and perfecting relevant judicial assistance system and legal responsibility system.