文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Estimation and Comparative Analysis of Environmental Efficiency in China, with and without Consideration of Haze

作者：Ma, Dongdong[1,2];He, Feng[2];Li, Guifang[3];Chen, Lili[2]

第一作者：Ma, Dongdong

通讯作者：He, F[1]

机构：[1]Henan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Econ, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, Peoples R China;[2]Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Donlinks Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China;[3]Renmin Univ China, Sch Econ, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China

第一机构：河南财经政法大学经济学院

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Donlinks Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.

年份：2018

卷号：27

期号：1

起止页码：201-211

外文期刊名：POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85041136622);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000419793200022)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000419793200022)】；

基金：This paper was finished as expected thanks to support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71272160 and 71673022).

语种：英文

外文关键词：haze; SBM-undesirable model; PM2.5; environmental efficiency; haze reduction potential

摘要：This paper aims to introduce the new constraints of PM2.5 into the environmental efficiency research framework, based on the provincial panel data of China during 2001-12. The authors examine environmental efficiency with and without consideration of PM2.5, conduct hypothesis tests on these environmental efficiencies, and analyze the energy savings and haze reduction. The results indicate that the overall environmental efficiency score is inefficient. The average environmental efficiency scores are 0.706 and 0.867 with and without the consideration of PM2.5, respectively, and omitting PM2.5 would result in biased environmental efficiency change. In addition, empirical analysis shows that there is an unbalanced regional development and significant differences among provinces in environmental efficiency. Last but not the least, the potential savings of energy, water, and regional haze reduction average 24.26%, 39.16%, and 26.49%, respectively.