文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：资源异质性视角下中国稀土定价权缺失本真研究

英文题名：Authenticity study on the lack of pricing power in China's rare earth from the perspective of resource heterogeneity

作者：袁中许[1]

第一作者：袁中许

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学经济学院

第一机构：河南财经政法大学经济学院

年份：2019

卷号：29

期号：4

起止页码：157-167

中文期刊名：中国人口·资源与环境

外文期刊名：China Population,Resources and Environment

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】；CSCD:【CSCD2019_2020】；

基金：国家自然科学基金项目"基于微观调查视角的中国制造业企业创新行为的演化研究"(批准号:71372036)

语种：中文

中文关键词：稀土资源异质性;定价权“双重缺失”;内因机理;实证

外文关键词：rare earth heterogeneity;pricing power 'double deficiency';intrinsic factor mechanism;empirical analysis

摘要：从重要而不可再生稀土资源的稀缺性价值与功能特性价值的异质性视角出发,分析和提出具有突出资源优势的中国稀土其贸易定价权长期缺失属于双重性质缺失:即一般稀土定价权缺失是以牺牲资源和环境利益为代价的"绝对丢失",而特种稀土定价权缺失为创造和体现可得性价值上的"相对迷失"。在定价权缺失状态和价格弹性条件分析基础上,分别根据异质成本古诺竞争理论与内生增长理论构建了两类不同性质稀土定价权缺失的内因机理模型。进而,运用1992—2009年两类稀土代表性产品贸易数据及相关稀土数据,先后采用动态面板GMM估计和面板RE检验,对中国两类稀土对外贸易定价权缺失及内因进行实证分析。结果证实了该"双重缺失"的理论分析判断,并表明稀土行业低集中度和特种稀土国际专利水平落后依次为一般稀土和特种稀土贸易定价权缺失的最主要内在因素,同时,也表明扭曲的国内稀土低端消费持续增长率与进口特种稀土消费比率偏低也分别是其缺失的重要因素。因而,针对中国稀土定价权缺失性质和内因本真,为其缺失根本治理和定价权科学全面增进与获取,并最终为维护稀土资源和价值利益及环境利益、以及在根本上促使中国稀土产业的战略可持续发展和广大稀土资源区域的协调可持续发展,国家和政府及稀土企业首先应采取相应分而治之的措施和战略。一方面,两类稀土定价权缺失抑制的战略储备上应实施不同策略,同时,它们定价权的实现也应有不同的科学战略目标定位。另一方面,应认清一般稀土定价权获取的关键基础和重要支撑,并把握好特种稀土定价权实现的关键和核心,此外,还应创新政府稀土管理。
For the important and non-renewable rare earth resources, from the perspective of the heterogeneity of scarcity value and functional property value, studies on the international pricing power of China rare earth are in double deficiencies: General rare earth pricing power loss is 'absolute loss' to sacrifice both resource and environment, while special rare earth pricing power loss is 'relative disorientation' in potential availability value. Based on the status of pricing power deficiencies and analysis of price elasticity conditions, this paper constructed endogenous mechanism models about the pricing power deficiencies, respectively based on Cournot competition theory with heterogeneous costs and endogenous growth theory. And then, in order to test the pricing power deficiency of two types of rare earth in China from 1992-2009 and intrinsic factors of the deficiencies, empirical analysis was carried out. The research results confirmed the theoretical judgment of 'double deficiencies' and showed that low industry concentration ratio was the main factor of the pricing power deficiency of general rare earth while the main factor of special rare earth lay in lagging patent level of itself. Meanwhile, it also indicated twisted sustaining growth rate of domestic rare earth low-level consumption and the lower consumption rate of imported special rare earth were important factors to cause deficiency. Therefore, in view of the nature and internal factors of the lack of China's rare earth pricing power and solving problems of lacking comprehensive improvement and acquisition of fundamental governance and pricing power, government and rare earth enterprises should first divide and rule this by taking corresponding measures and strategies, to finally maintain rare earth resources, value benefits and environmental interest, and promote the strategic and sustainable development of China's rare earth, as well as the coordinated and sustainable development of regional rare earth. On the one hand, for two types of rare earth, different measures of strategic reserves should be implemented to inhibit the pricing power deficiency, and different scientific strategic objectives should be made in pricing power. On the other hand, we should recognize the key foundation and important support for the acquisition of general rare earth pricing power and grasp the key points to realize special rare earth pricing power. In addition, we still need to innovate the government's rare earth management.