文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：行政附带民事诉讼必要性质疑

英文题名：Questioning the Necessarity of Administrative with Civil Action

作者：张继荣[1]

第一作者：张继荣

机构：[1]河南省政法管理干部学院行政法系

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院

年份：2003

卷号：22

期号：1

起止页码：105-108

中文期刊名：河南教育学院学报：哲学社会科学版

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

语种：中文

中文关键词：行政附带民事诉讼;必要性;诉讼程序;行政机关;民事争议

外文关键词：administrative with civil action; judicial procedure; necessarity

摘要：行政附带民事诉讼在理论提出的同时,其司法实践的尝试却遇到诸如管辖、法庭调查、攀证、辩论、裁判等方面的困难;对产生行政附带民事诉讼的行政机关裁决民事争议制度,立法在减少相关规定,行政机关在放弃这类职权;反观其理论本身就具有缺陷,未考虑行政附带民事诉讼与刑事附带民事诉讼的差异而进行简单的借鉴,导致诉讼过程中参与各方利益关系失衡。行政附带民事诉讼实无存在之必要。
When the theory of administrative with civil action was raised, its judicial and praction attempts faced up to some difficulties such as jurisdiction, court investigation giving evidence, argument, etc. The legislation of the systems that administrative organs should adjudge the administrative with civil action,has been reduced.And administrative organs intend to give up the adjudgment rights. On the other hand, the theory itself has defects. The theory has been simply used for reference without considering the difference between criminal with civil action and administrative with civil action, with the result that the interests of each participants are out of blance during the proceedings. It is no necessarily for administrative with civil action toexist.