文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：高校智库评价指标体系的构建及实证研究——基于第四代评估理论视角

英文题名：Construction and Empirical Research of Evaluation Index System of University Think Tank:Based on the Perspective of the Fourth Generation Evaluation Theory

作者：郭瑞[1];杨天通[2]

第一作者：郭瑞

机构：[1]郑州航空工业管理学院,郑州450046;[2]河南财经政法大学马克思主义学院,郑州450046

第一机构：郑州航空工业管理学院,郑州450046

年份：2021

卷号：6

期号：5

起止页码：33-44

中文期刊名：智库理论与实践

外文期刊名：Think Tank:Theory & Practice

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2021_2022】；

基金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“当代中国公共决策咨询程序与机制的探索研究”(项目编号:12CGL086)研究成果之一。

语种：中文

中文关键词：高校智库;评价指标体系;实证研究;第四代评估理论

外文关键词：university think tank;evaluation index system;empirical research;the fourth generation of evaluation theory

摘要：[目的/意义]基于第四代评估理论,从多元评价主体参与视角,探索高校智库评价指标体系的建设,为高校智库评价提供理论工具及新视角。[方法/过程]本文采用实证研究和理论研究相结合的范式,对高校智库研究人员、智库评价人员、科研评价人员(第三方评价机构)、政府人员、媒体人员、社会公众等进行问卷调查,构建高校智库评价指标体系。回收有效问卷427份,通过因子分析对其进行优化及赋权,形成高校智库"智库投入及平台建设因子" "智库政府和社会影响力因子" "智库对外合作交流因子" "智库学术生产力因子"4个公因子的指标体系。[结果/结论]本文提出以下建议对高校智库评价进行引导:转变评估理念,完善评估机制;强调利益相关者的共同参与,尊重评估兼容性和结果导向;重视高校智库评价市场受众互动与合作等。
[Purpose/significance]Based on the fourth generation of evaluation theory,this paper constructs an evaluation index system of college think tanks with multiple evaluation subjects,in order to provide theoretical tools and a new perspective for the evaluation of college think tanks in China.[Method/process]Using the paradigm of combining empirical research and theoretical research,this paper conducts a questionnaire survey among think tank and university think tank researchers,think tank evaluators,scientific research evaluators,government personnel,media personnel,the public and so on,and establishes the evaluation index system of think tank in university.427 valid questionnaires were collected and optimized and weighted by factor analysis.Four common factors were formed in the index system of college think tanks,including "think tank input and platform construction factor" "think tank government and social influence factor" "think tank foreign cooperation and exchange factor" "think tank academic productivity factor".[Results/Conclusion]The following suggestions are put forward to guide the evaluation of college think tanks:change the evaluation concept,form a perfect evaluation mechanism;emphasize the participation of stakeholders,respect the compatibility of assessment and result orientation;emphasis should be paid to the interaction and cooperation between the think tanks of colleges and universities in evaluating the market audience.