文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：平原和山区县域聚落空间演变对比分析——以河南省延津县和宝丰县为例

英文题名：Comparison on Spatial Evolution of Rural Settlements between the Flat and the Mountainous Areas:Evidence from Yanjin County and Baofeng County,Henan Province

作者：娄帆[1,2];李小建[1,2,3];陈晓燕[1]

第一作者：娄帆

机构：[1]河南大学环境与规划学院;[2]河南财经政法大学中原经济区三化协调发展河南省协同创新中心;[3]河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心

第一机构：河南大学环境与规划学院,中国河南开封475004

年份：2017

卷号：0

期号：4

起止页码：158-166

中文期刊名：经济地理

外文期刊名：Economic Geography

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2017_2018】；CSCD:【CSCD2017_2018】；

基金：国家自然科学基金项目(41471117);教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD770021);河南省软科学重大项目(152400410098)

语种：中文

中文关键词：城镇化;乡村聚落;地区;山区;演变;延津县;宝丰县

外文关键词：urbanization;;rural settlement;;the flat area;;the mountainous area;;evolution;;Yanjin County;;Baofeng County

摘要：以发展水平大致相当的平原县(延津县)和山区县(宝丰县)为例,基于1972、1990、2013年聚落斑块数据,运用景观格局指数、统计分析等方法对两县聚落空间演变进行对比分析表明:1两县聚落均呈集聚分布,平原县聚落逐渐趋向随机分布,而山区县集聚趋势逐渐增强。2景观指数显示两县聚落斑块面积占比变动相似,而平均斑块面积平原县明显大于山区县,且增长程度较大;平原县聚落斑块数量、密度均持续减小,而山区县持续变大;平原县最大斑块指数增加明显,而山区县有所下降;聚落邻近程度均在增强,但山区县表现更突出;1990年代前聚落扩展明显快于1990年代后,这一差异在山区县更为明显。3平原县中间位序聚落较多,聚落规模分布趋于集中,各等级规模聚落扩展差异较小;而山区县聚落规模分布趋于分散,中等规模聚落相对较少。4两县聚落扩展均快于人口增长,但1990年代后山区县两者趋于一致;经济发展不能很好地解释两县聚落扩展的差异;地形直接造成两县聚落分布模式和景观指数的不同;交通对平原县聚落的影响较山区更为显著;乡镇点对山区县聚落的影响更为复杂,其辐射带动作用均有待进一步加强。
Selecting two counties in which one is located in the plain(Yanjin county) and the other is in the mountainous area(Baofeng county) as cases, we analyze the differences of settlement spatial evolution between the two counties from the 1970 s. The results show that:(1) Plain county settlements become more dispersed, distributed throughout the county and gradually moving towards a random distribution, but mountainous county settlements become more agglomeration and the degree of agglomeration gradually increase during the study period.(2) Both two counties' settlement area increase, while mean patch size of plain county is significantly larger than mountainous county, and also grows more.Number of patches and patch density decrease in plain county while they increase in mountainous county. Largest patch index increases significantly in plain county, while it's opposite in mountainous county. Mean nearest-neighbor distance decreases and the proximity in plain county is weaker than mountainous county. Settlement continues to expand in both two counties and the expansion before the 1990 s is significantly faster than after the 1990 s, the difference is more obvious in mountainous county.(3) The settlement scale distribution of plain county tends to be concentrated, the middle settlement is more, settlement system is relatively reasonable. The mountainous county tends to be scattered, large-scale and small-scale settlements are more.(4) Population growth and economic development promote the settlement expansion. Compared with population, settlement expands faster, after 1990 the settlement expansion and population growth in mountainous county are convergence. Economic development cannot explain the difference of evolution of the settlements in the two counties. Terrain condition is the direct reason which leads to the difference between plain county and mountainous county in settlement distribution patterns and landscape index. The impact of traffic on the plain county settlements is more significant than mountainous county. The effect of township point is more complex on settlement in mountainous county, the leading role of the township points is to be further strengthened.