文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：“恶法非法”命题的澄清与辩护

英文题名：The Clarification and Defense of the LEX INIUSTA NON EST LEX Thesis

作者：王志勇[1]

第一作者：王志勇

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学法学院,郑州450046

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院

年份：2018

卷号：0

期号：12

起止页码：10-21

中文期刊名：复印报刊资料：法理学．法史学

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：2015国家社会科学基金项目哲学类重大课题“良法善治视域下法治与德治关系研究”的阶段性成果(项目编号:15AZX021)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：恶法非法;自然法理论;法律实证主义;法律的性质

外文关键词：LEX INIUSTA NON EST LEX;natural law theory;legal positivism;the nature of law

摘要：奥斯丁等法律实证主义者对“恶法非法”命题提出了“概念性批判”“无政府主义批判”和“保守主义批判”。观念史的考察显示,上述批判要么错失焦点,要么存在不同程度的误解。“恶法非法”命题具有多重丰富内涵,理论上至少存在强弱两种解读。从言语行为理论出发可以为如下一种弱解读提供辩护,即区分法律的成功条件和缺陷条件而分别赋予其不同效力。由此或可表明,法律的性质不仅仅具有事实面向,也具有理想面向。对于当下中国法治.实践,法律具有的“程度性”特征提醒我们,要更加注重法律背后的价值因素,有区别地对待“恶法”的效力问题。
“the conceptual objection”,“the anarchy objection”and“the conservative objection”were used by legal positivists such as John Austin to criticize the LEX INIUSTA NON EST LEX thesis.Exploration on the history of the notion showed that the above objections either were out of the focus or misunderstood the thesis.The LEX INIUSTA NON EST LEX thesis was of a variety of dimensions,and could be read at stronger or weaker sense.The weak reading of the LEX INIUSTA NON EST LEX thesis could be defended from the speech act theory.According the weak reading,there were the successful condition and the non-defectiveness of law as a speech act according to which different legal status were given to the law.Thus it might suggest that the nature of law consists in not merely the factual dimension but also the ideal dimension.With respect the practice of Rule of law in China,the“degree”character of law warned us that we should pay more attention to the value behind the law and address the validity of"unjust law "discriminatively.