文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：非法经营罪的教义学限缩

英文题名：The Doctrinal Limitation of the Crime of Illegal Business Operation

作者：丁华宇[1];孟念[1]

第一作者：丁华宇

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

年份：2024

期号：2

起止页码：177-186

中文期刊名：社会科学论坛

外文期刊名：Tribune of Social Sciences

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目《网络诈骗犯罪的刑法规制研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:2021BFX008。

语种：中文

中文关键词：非法经营罪;堵截条款;空白罪状;罪量要素;教义学限缩

外文关键词：crime of illegal business operation;interdiction clause;blank charges;elements of quantity;limitation of doctrinal meaning

摘要：非法经营罪由于越权司法解释及法官滥用自由裁量权而在司法实践中不断异化扩张,对其进行刑法教义学限缩具有现实紧迫性。非法经营罪的异化扩张主要表现为司法者混淆本罪与他罪客体界限,对罪状要素存在任意解释和扩大解释现象。非法经营罪异化的根源在于司法,而不在立法,司法者过度重视刑法的法益保护机能,忽视自由保障功能,有悖罪刑法定原则,并且过度灵活的司法适用有滋生刑法工具主义之风险。刑法教义学的司法适用功能及立法促进功能为限缩本罪提供了有效的解决方案,对非法经营罪堵截条款的理解应遵循同质解释规则,并从体系解释的视角确立“明确罪名优先适用”的规则以解决法条竞合问题,在解释的过程中对立法进行体系内的反思,从而推动在立法上进一步限缩本罪的适用范围。
The crime of illegal business operation is constantly expanding in judicial practice because of the overstepping judicial interpretation and the abuse of discretionary power by judges.The alienation expansion of the crime of illegal business is mainly manifested as the judicator confuses the boundary between the crime and the object of other crimes,and arbitrarily interprets and expands the interpretation of the elements of the crime.The root of the alienation of illegal business crime lies in judicature,not legislation.Judicators pay too much attention to the function of protecting legal interests of criminal law,ignore the function of protecting freedom,go against the principle of legality of crime and punishment.And excessively flexible judicial application may breed the risk of instrumentalism of criminal law.The judicial application function and legislative promotion function of the criminal law doctrine provide an effective solution for limiting and reducing the crime.The understanding of the provisions on the prevention of illegal business crimes should follow the homogeneous interpretation rule,and the rule of“clear charge priority application”should be established from the perspective of system interpretation to solve the problem of the competition and cooperation of law articles.In this way,the scope of application of this crime is further limited in legislation.