文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：论作为数据权益客体的数据集合

英文题名：On the Object of Data Rights

作者：赵加兵[1]

第一作者：赵加兵

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州450046

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院

年份：2021

卷号：39

期号：7

起止页码：111-127

中文期刊名：河北法学

外文期刊名：Hebei Law Science

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2021_2022】；

基金：2018年河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“大数据时代个人信息权利义务体系研究”(2018CFX020)

语种：中文

中文关键词：数据;数据权益;“数据集合”;民事权益客体;“数据集合”的确定

外文关键词：data;data rights;"data collection";the object of civil rights;determination of "data collection"

摘要：数据权益是指数据管控者对其管控的数据享有的权益。这种权益应受民事法律保护。但对于数据权益客体为何,理论界存在争议,形成了"数据非客体论""数据信息论"及"数据文件论"等观点。从规范精当角度而言,将数据权益客体界定为"数据集合"较为合适。"数据集合"是指由一定数量的符号化数据按照某种目的汇集在一起而形成的数据包。以"数据集合"概念统领数据权益客体范畴既符合数据权益客体研究的基本方向,也契合民事权利客体体系发展的内在需求,还吻合数据要素市场建构的实践目标。对比"数据集合"与传统民事权利客体可知,"数据集合"是有别于物、知识产品及人格利益的新型民事权利客体。"数据集合"作为权利客体所具有的可区别性及可识别性应采取有别于传统民事权利客体的确定和公示机制。"数据集合"区别机制建构可采取事后判断模式,"数据集合"识别机制建构可采取交易确定模式。
Data rights refer to the rights that data controllers have on the data they control. Such rights shall be protected by civil law. But as to the object of data rights, there is controversy in theory, forming the views of "data non-object theory","data information theory" and "data file theory". From the perspective of precise specification, it is more appropriate to define the object of data rights as the "data collection". The "data collection" refers to a data packet formed by a certain amount of symbolized data collected for a certain purpose. Using the concept of "data collection" to generalize the scope of the object of data rights not only conforms to the basic direction of the object of data rights research, but also meets to the inherent needs of the development of the object of civil rights, and also coincides to the practical goals of the construction of the data element market. Comparing the "data collection" with the traditional object of civil rights, it can be seen that the "data collection" is a new type of object of civil rights that is different from things, intellectual products and personality interests.The distinguishability and identifiability of "data collection" as the object of rights should adopt a determination and publicity mechanism that is different from the object of traditional civil rights. The construction of the "data collection" distinction mechanism can adopt the model of ex-post judgment, and the construction of the "data collection" recognition mechanism shall adopt the mode of transaction determination.