文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：贪污罪与盗窃罪法律处遇差异的社会学反思

英文题名：A Sociological Reflection on the Different Treatment of Corruption and Theft

作者：刘用军[1]

第一作者：刘用军

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

年份：2017

卷号：0

期号：3

起止页码：74-83

中文期刊名：中国海洋大学学报：社会科学版

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2017_2018】；

基金：2016年河南省哲学社会科学规划项目<社会转型背景下司法队伍稳定问题研究>的阶段性成果(2016BFX004)

语种：中文

中文关键词：贪污罪;盗窃罪;法律处遇;社会学;公平

外文关键词：corruption; th e f t; law treatment; sociology; justice

摘要：贪污罪和盗窃罪在立法和司法层面法律处遇差别的普遍化存在,实际上带来了刑罚配置的公平性问题。无论是古代中国,还是当代法治国家,贪污罪的惩治一直重于盗窃罪,主要在于对前者身份的特殊要求。近年来的立法趋势显示,贪污罪轻刑化正在成为一种反腐治理新手段。从社会学层面考察,这一现状形成有社会、民意、政治、政策和立法五方面原因。应当适当修正这种奖励性的过于功利性的反腐措施,以回归贪污罪与盗窃罪之间犯罪与刑罚对应之本身的公平性。
The differential treatment of corruption and theft is quite common in the legislative and judi-cial level？ which would lead to a suspicion of penal fairness. Both in ancient China and contemporary states governed by law？ the punishment of corruption has been more severe than theft, mainly due to the special requirements for the former identity. In recent years？ legislative trends show that light punishment of cor-ruption is becoming a new anti-corruptionmeans？ undoubtedly giving rise to the unfairness of penalty be-tween corruption and theft. From a sociological perspective, the current situation has beenshaped by socie-ty , public opinion, politics, policy and system. It would be appropriate to amend this kind of incentive and utilitarian anti-corruption measures？ in order to return to the fair penalty between corruption and theft.