文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：论公职人员职务犯罪的认罪认罚从宽之适用

英文题名：On the Application of Leniency in Penalty Measurement for Those Who Confess for Public Officials'Duty Crimes

作者：刘用军[1]

第一作者：刘用军

机构：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,郑州450046

第一机构：河南财经政法大学法学院|河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

年份：2020

卷号：35

期号：4

起止页码：19-27

中文期刊名：江苏警官学院学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：2017年度国家社科基金“监察委员会体制下职务犯罪侦查权运行与制约机制研究”(17BFX056)的阶段性成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：职务犯罪;认罪认罚从宽;刑事诉讼

外文关键词：duty crime;lenient admission of guilt;criminal litigation

摘要：认罪认罚从宽制度在刑事诉讼中适用于全部认罪案件,监察法对职务犯罪认罪认罚从宽的规定与刑事诉讼法不同,只有符合严格的条件才能适用;同时刑法修正案(九)也对职务犯罪增加了罚金刑和贪污受贿罪的终身监禁;在最近的司法解释中,职务犯罪的减刑、假释条件也严格于普通犯罪。由此,我国已经构建出立法、司法到执行全流程的职务犯罪从严处罚和执行机制。但将限制职务犯罪认罪认罚从宽适用交给监察法来规定的做法,以及通过司法解释来限制职务犯罪行刑过程中的减刑、假释,客观上破坏了刑事立法分配刑罚的协调性,在不同犯罪之间造成了行刑上的不平等待遇。我国应当通过立法纠正这一问题,保障犯罪之间量刑的公正性和罪犯之间行刑待遇的平等性。
The lenient system of admission of guilt and punishment has been widely applied in criminal proceedings and applied to all cases of admission of guilt.However,the lenient provisions of the supervisory law on admission and punishment of duty crimes are different from those of the criminal procedure law,which can only be applied if they meet strict conditions.Besides,the ninth amendment of the Criminal Law has also increased the fine penalty and life imprisonment for the crime of corruption and bribery.In the recent judicial interpretation,the commutation and parole conditions for the duty crime are also stricter than those for the ordinary crime.That is to say,under the current situation of high-pressure anti-corruption,a strict punishment and enforcement mechanism for duty crimes has been established from legislation,justice to implementation.The practice of applying lenient admission of guilty of restricting duty crime to the law of supervision,as well as the judicial interpretation to restrict the commutation and parole in the execution of duty crime also objectively destroys the coordination of criminal legislation in the distribution of penalty,resulting in unequal treatment of execution among different crimes.In view of the lack of special prevention value of duty crime itself,it also causes the malpractice that duty crime becomes a tool of pure deterrence.We should correct this problem through legislation,and guarantee the justice of sentencing between crimes and the equality of punishment treatment between criminals.